Our Common Good
I go crazy with all these Democrats saying you have to go conservative to win, you have to go cautious to win. These damned consultants come in and say, ‘This is how you have to run,’ and it’s always the same: raise money, spend it on television, don’t say anything that will offend anyone. And the Democrats do it and then they end up in tight races, worried about whether they’ll make it,” says Sanders, who caucuses with Democrats but rarely takes advice from anyone in Washington. “For the life of me, I can’t figure out why progressives listen to consultants. Building movements, making progress on progressive issues— you have to talk to people, educate people, organize people.

The Secret of Bernie Sanders’s Success

Sanders bristles when pundits who don’t know Vermont dismiss his approach to campaigning as a regional deviation that might work in what is often portrayed as a quirky liberal state that couldn’t possibly have relevance for the rest of the country. “It wasn’t that long ago that Vermont was one of the most Republican states in the country. Until two years ago, the governor was a Republican; the lieutenant governor is a Republican. This is a significantly rural state. This is a state with some very conservative regions.” Yet, Sanders won by wide margins even in areas where Democrats run poorly. Why? Because the senator does not waste money on TV commercials designed to scare or fool voters into backing him. Rather, he goes where voters live. Personal Democracy Media co-founder and editorial director Micah Sifry, who has followed Sanders and Vermont politics for years, recalls: “Visiting hunting lodges to talk about protecting natural resources for hunting and fishing and establishing a connection with [hunters] was one of the ways that Sanders managed to earn the trust of the predominantly conservative and working-class Northeast Kingdom section of Vermont, which regularly gives Sanders, a self-declared socialist, its hearty support.”

If national Democrats did the same, Sanders suggests, there could be many more progressive Democrats representing rural states. He gets furious at the “swing-state strategies” that target a few competitive states and districts while neglecting the long-term work of building support in “What’s the Matter With Kansas?” areas.

More at The Nation

  1. sheenasupermal reblogged this from venusinthenight
  2. venusinthenight reblogged this from amindamazed
  3. thesecondfox reblogged this from technicolorrelays
  4. cookiecaked reblogged this from queenofattolia
  5. technicolorrelays reblogged this from amindamazed
  6. amindamazed reblogged this from mswyrr
  7. sambadeorly reblogged this from mswyrr
  8. amikae reblogged this from thepandabaker
  9. theredshoes reblogged this from mswyrr
  10. thepandabaker reblogged this from mommapolitico
  11. flirtingwithparadox reblogged this from mswyrr
  12. thefirstwetnosaur reblogged this from mswyrr
  13. queenofattolia reblogged this from mswyrr
  14. mommapolitico reblogged this from mswyrr
  15. mswyrr reblogged this from sarahlee310
  16. heyitslars reblogged this from sarahlee310
  17. theprogressiveprimate reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  18. psychedelicmicrobus reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  19. girlswithincendiaryvices reblogged this from green-street-politics
  20. figureitoutontheway reblogged this from seriouslyamerica